Statement
![]()
Proof
By the definition of the derivative:
![]()
. Add this to the numerator of the equation above. Since it equals zero, it won’t change the value of the numerator:
![]()
Rearrange:
![]()
This is equivalent to:
![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \frac{d}{dx}\left[ f(x)g(x)\right] = \underbrace{\left( \displaystyle\lim_{h\to 0}f(x+h)\right)}_{f(x)}\underbrace{ \left(\displaystyle\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{g(x+h)-g(x)}{h}\right)}_{g^\prime(x)} + \underbrace{\left(\displaystyle\lim_{h\to 0}g(x)\right)}_{g(x)}\underbrace{\left(\displaystyle\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h} \right)}_{f^\prime(x)}](https://www.samartigliere.com/wp-content/ql-cache/quicklatex.com-3db5b982909ed9f5fc4c84e24f5a7e4b_l3.png)
So,
![]()
which is what we were trying to prove.
Musings on science, religion, etc.
![]()
By the definition of the derivative:
![]()
. Add this to the numerator of the equation above. Since it equals zero, it won’t change the value of the numerator:
![]()
Rearrange:
![]()
This is equivalent to:
![Rendered by QuickLaTeX.com \frac{d}{dx}\left[ f(x)g(x)\right] = \underbrace{\left( \displaystyle\lim_{h\to 0}f(x+h)\right)}_{f(x)}\underbrace{ \left(\displaystyle\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{g(x+h)-g(x)}{h}\right)}_{g^\prime(x)} + \underbrace{\left(\displaystyle\lim_{h\to 0}g(x)\right)}_{g(x)}\underbrace{\left(\displaystyle\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h} \right)}_{f^\prime(x)}](https://www.samartigliere.com/wp-content/ql-cache/quicklatex.com-3db5b982909ed9f5fc4c84e24f5a7e4b_l3.png)
So,
![]()
which is what we were trying to prove.